FIN 48 For Private Companies

February 23rd, 2010

FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48) compliance becomes mandatory for private companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.  Companies that do not adhere to FIN 48 will need a GAAP exception in their financial statements.  FIN 48 requires companies to establish reserves for uncertain income tax positions.  The Journal of New England Technology wrote an article describing FIN 48’s impact on private company tax reporting.  The article lists items that private companies must disclose in their financial statements and exposure areas to consider when taking aggressive tax positions.

Generally speaking, most pass-through entities do not have income tax exposure as the income passes through to the shareholders.  However, we have seen that most of our clients’ pass-through entities are still being affected by FIN 48.  Documentation needs to be provided to substantiate that there are no uncertain tax positions.  Some positions that need to be considered are multi state nexus, exposure due to acquisition transactions and built in gains tax for S elections after a company had been a C corporation.  We are seeing these issues with our clients that have previously taken aggressive positions by not filing state tax returns or documenting fair market values in the year an S election was made.

Impact of FIN 48 on Nonprofit Organizations in 2009

Beginning in 2009 all exempt organizations became subject to FIN 48.   In applying FIN 48 to an exempt organization, the tax position in question could be the organization’s tax exempt status itself.  As the exemption is a tax position, there should be documentation that establishes the level of certainty of that position.  The organization’s Form 1023 or 1024, Application for Exemption, could confirm that the current activities of the organization are actually those which were stated in their application.   Other potential uncertain tax positions for exempt organizations could be unrelated business taxable income, alternative investments, and taxable subsidiaries.  FIN 48 is intended to promote transparency and must be adopted with the new Form 990, which was revised by the IRS to also promote greater transparency.

Do you have issues regarding FIN 48?

Have you taken uncertain tax positions such as not filing in states in which you have physical presence?

Fraud Risk Assessment

February 18th, 2010

The Richmond Times-Dispatch ran an article on common fraud schemes.  The schemes detailed in the article can be found in companies of all shapes and sizes and are often perpetrated by long time employees.  Several of our clients have encountered similar schemes over the years including fictitious vendors, loose cash handling controls and management override of controls to name a few.

The article is also relevant due to the recent guidance published by the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA).  The IIA’s publication on “Internal Auditing and Fraud” provides a clear outline of organizational responsibilities and internal processes to implement that will help you prevent and detect fraud occurrences.

Do you have methods to prevent and detect fraud in your organization?  How would you handle a fraud if you suspected it was occurring?  Would you be interested in performing a Fraud Risk Assessment to determine your organization’s fraud risks and associated controls?

CIO Mistakes to Avoid

February 14th, 2010

CIOs are faced with challenges on a daily basis.  This article provides a list 8 mistakes to avoid. It is a pretty good list and a number of items definitely ring true for any leadership position, not just CIO.  Our experiences as IT auditors have shown a number of these occurring, but 2 stick out: “No. 6: Failing to build accountability into the IT organization” and “No. 8: Losing sight of the big picture”.

From an audit perspective, lack of accountability can lead to weak controls of critical systems and data.  Additionally, losing sight of the big picture can lead to projects that are not in line with business strategy and IT departments that do not effectively use resources, time, and money.

What experiences (IT or non IT) have you had in your organization?  What other audit concerns could come from this list?

-->