Archive for June, 2009

ERM vs GRC

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

“Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) are pretty similar in definition and are often sited interchangeably. I’ve often asked what the difference was, so I’m sure you may have asked the same question.

After some quick web searching, I found this interesting article on the difference between ERM and GRC.

In it’s simplest form, the difference is simply in their names. ERM includes identifying risk appetite, assessing risk, integrating risk management in daily decisions, and monitoring risks. GRC is an umbrella philosophy that includes risk management, governance, and compliance. GRC may include ERM as the methodology of managing risk, but it may not. If an ERM program is linked to governance and risk, then it might transition into a true GRC program.

There is certainly more to ERM and GRC programs, but that is the nuts and bolts difference between the two.

Are you interested in implementing ERM or GRC programs successfully?  If you’ve already implemented these programs at your organization – what pitfalls have you faced?  What success stories do you have?”

Think Madoff’s Fraud Can’t Happen to You?

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

While the Madoff case has been receiving substantial national media coverage in recent months, a similar fraud was conducted a little closer to home. Click here to read the recently published article titled, “The Vavasseur Prime Bank Securities Fraud: A New Twist on the Classic Ponzi Scheme.”

This feature article was published in the March/April issue of the VSCPA’s Disclosures magazine and was co-authored by Harold G. Martin, Jr., CPA, ABV, CFF, ASA, CFE, Principal-in-Charge of the Business Valuation, Forensic, and Litigation Services Group at Keiter Stephens.

Privately-held Businesses Tax Relief Provisions in the 2009 Stimulus Act for Businesses

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

The recently enacted “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009” (the 2009 Economic Stimulus Act) contains a wide-ranging tax package that includes tax relief for businesses. However, there are certain calculations and deadlines that need to be met to take full advantage of the provisions.

  • The Stimulus Act temporarily extends the higher Section 179 expense amounts available in 2008 for an additional year. Under this provision, business owners can elect to immediately expense up to $250,000 of qualified equipment purchased during the 2009 tax year, rather than depreciate it over time. This benefit will continue to phase-out on a dollar-for-dollar basis once qualified equipment purchases exceed $800,000.
  • The Stimulus Act also extends availability of the 50% bonus depreciation provision for capital expenditures incurred in 2009 (2010 for aircraft and long-production-period property). This provision allows business owners to take 50% bonus depreciation in the year that the property is placed in service. In addition, the Stimulus Act extends the placed-in-service deadline for the $8,000 increase in first-year depreciation provision on qualified vehicles placed in service by December 31, 2009.
  • The current difficult economic situation has likely caused many businesses to incur a net operating loss (NOL) in 2008. Before the Stimulus Act, NOLs could generally be carried back only two years and, if there was a tax liability in those two years, taxes paid could be refunded to the taxpayer. For 2008 NOLs, the Stimulus Act extends the two-year carry-back to three, four, or five years increasing the likelihood, availability, and amount of the refund to enhance the business’s cash flow.
  • Other business provisions of the Stimulus Act include an increased exclusion amount for a gain from the sale of small business stock, easing of the built-in-gains rules, delayed recognition of certain cancellation of debt income, and incentives to hire unemployed veterans and disconnected youth.