Archive for May, 2010

Carried Interest Taxation

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

It comes as no surprise that provisions changing the tax characteristics of carried interests from long term capital gain to ordinary income will probably be passed, but Ways and Means Chair Sander Levin reinforced the possibility yesterday by noting that carried interests will probably be used as an offset in the extenders bill we expect to be deliberated in the next two weeks. Levin also noted that he expects the carried interest provisions to be expanded to include interests in all industries (most notably gas/oil and real estate) and not just financial management firms.  Timing about the introduction of the new extenders bill is still sketchy, and as the articles appended below show there is still some uncertainty about when the bill will be introduced. But we should probably expect it to be deliberated by the Memorial Day recess. The excerpt below details Levin’s expectations of this legislation.

Levin Expects Phased-In Carried Interest Change to Be Key Offset for Extenders

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Sander Levin (D-Mich.) said May 11 that he expects a phased-in change to the tax treatment of carried interest to be a main offset for the tax extenders legislation moving toward the House floor.

Levin said the exact details of the carried interest provision are still being worked out, but the legislation (H.R. 4213) would not include any carve-outs to exempt particular industries and would ultimately match the tax rate paid on carried interest income to ordinary income tax rates.

The bill, which was renamed the Promoting American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act, will have a total of roughly $50 billion in fully offset tax provisions. It is expected to go to the House floor during the week of May 17, Levin said. He added that there will not be any full committee hearing or markup of the legislation because most of the provisions have already been vetted by the committee in prior bills.

The legislation will include a slightly scaled back version of the Build America Bonds provision originally in the small business tax bill (H.R. 4849). Levin said he and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) opted to tailor bonds provision back because of its cost.

Levin also said lawmakers are still discussing whether to include a provision from the small business tax bill that would raise $7.7 billion by stopping companies from using subsidiaries to channel deductible payments through U.S. tax treaty countries before earnings are repatriated to a tax haven. Information provided by BNA.com – posted May 11, 2010

IRS Official Says Service Uses Form 990 to Avoid Audits

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

The Internal Revenue Service exempt organizations division will not be auditing organizations for lack of appropriate governance policies, but it will be looking at organizations more often and talking to them about particular issues, if agents see from the required Form 990 filings that charities do not have mechanisms in place to ensure good governance, an IRS official said April 21.

“The more we can use the Form 990 to figure out who needs our attention and who doesn’t, the less likely we are to show up on your doorstep when you are a compliant taxpayer,” said IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Commissioner Sarah Hall Ingram.

Speaking at a nonprofit governance conference cosponsored by the Independent Sector and IRS, Ingram also said it is too early to discuss trends, but IRS is exploring why some organizations have failed to answer new questions or fill out new schedules on governance on the revised Form 990.

“We would like to look a little more closely at the patterns on blank spaces,” she said, “and we will be talking with some folks on some of those.” The IRS may address the lack of compliance by talking to stakeholders, sending letters to charities, or adding clarifications to the instructions for the Form 990 for the coming year, she said, in case there is any “ambiguity” on whether IRS wanted something filled out.

Information provided by BNA.com – posted April 21, 2010

Please contact Tom Denson or Ginny Gunther at 804-747-0000 if you would like to discuss your nonprofit’s Form 990.

Qualified Therapeutic Discovery Tax Credit

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

A taxpayer planning on applying for the discretionary tax credit under new Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §48D must immediately begin documenting why the IRS should choose its qualifying therapeutic discovery project and award the taxpayer credits rather than awarding these to other applicants’ therapeutic discovery projects.

This new tax credit was added to the IRC under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148).  It provides that a taxpayer, which is a company employing no more than 250 people, through either a tax credit or cash grant, may seek to recover up to 50% for a qualified investment made in 2009 and 2010 in a qualifying therapeutic discovery project.

A qualified investment is described in the legislation as the aggregate amount of costs paid or incurred in 2009 and 2010 for expenses necessary for and directly related to the conduct of a qualifying therapeutic discovery project.  A qualifying investment does not include compensation paid to the company’s CEO or certain other officers, interest expense, facilities maintenance expense, certain indirect general and administrative costs, or any other expenditure as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury as appropriate to carry out the purpose of the legislation.

A qualifying therapeutic discovery project is a project designed to develop a product, process, or therapy to diagnose, treat, or prevent diseases and afflictions by conducting pre-clinical activities, clinical trials, clinical studies, and research protocols, or by developing technology or products designed to diagnose diseases and conditions, including molecular and companion drugs and diagnostic, or to further the delivery or administration of therapeutics.

A taxpayer interested in qualifying for these credits must first apply for IRS/ Department of Health and Human Service (HHS) certification, explaining, in a compelling, well-written, believable narrative which nonscientists can understand, why the taxpayer and the project qualify for the credit.  In evaluating applications the IRS and HHS are seeking projects which will reasonably result in:

1)      new ways to treat unmet medical needs;

2)      prevention, treatment, or detection of chronic or acute diseases;

3)      reduced U.S. healthcare costs over time; or

4)      significant advances toward curing cancer within 30 years.

It is expected competition for the $1billion of tax credits allotted under IRC §48D will be stiff.  A taxpayer interested in applying for these credits must be ready to submit its application as soon as the program commences, which is currently planned for May 23.

Contact Robert Tobey if you would like to discuss how your company may qualify for the IRC §41D credit or would like to engage us to help draft your application.  We will post updates on guidance for applying for these credits as it becomes available.